Talk:Wayside Theatre

Wayside Theatre has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: July 9, 2024. (Reviewed version).

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Theatre Low‑importance

	Theatre portal This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Virginia Low‑importance

	Virginia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

Passed. Recon rabbit 14:08, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Wayside Theatre/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: APK (talk · contribs) 08:49, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Reconrabbit (talk · contribs) 16:59, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again, I've read this article through and feel now is as good a time as any to start reviewing it. I did a quick copyedit of the article just beforehand but will bring up the few things that were unclear in the prose here and then start on the rest of the review. Recon rabbit 16:59, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

There is a mention of actors dealing with limited space in the lead, but the article doesn't specifically address concerns of this limitation, only the numerous renovations over the years.

Done APK hi :-) (talk) 10:02, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No citations - okay per MOS:LEADCITE. Y

Other prose notes

1990s: Before the 1996 season began, Wayside hosted four performances of Always Patsy Cline at John Handley High School, since Wayside's stage was too small for the event. It was the first and only time Wayside acted as hosts of another company's show. This should clarify that Always Patsy Cline wasn't a Wayside production; it's unclear that it was a national/off-broadway production from the information provided.

Done APK hi :-) (talk) 10:02, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References

Some potential copyright violations were identified but are dismissed as they are all pointing towards lengthy quotations. Will keep a look out for close paraphrasing.
allaboutwayside.com is a self-published source, but works well to supplement the information that is there and has been verified by secondary sources as coming from what could be described as an expert in the field.

Source checks

Based on this revision:

[1], [2] Y (confirmed from recent Historic District GA)
[4] Y based on google books preview.
[5] ~~N Was the wrong reference used? This is an 1887 photo of high school students.~~
[6], [7] Y
[8] Y
[9] Y
[13] Y
[18] Y
[65] Y
[83] Y
[93] Y
[105] Y
[110] Y
[113] Y
[125] Y
[139] Y
[163] Y
[169] Y
[180] Y
[181] Y

Many offline sources couldn't be checked but are corroborated by allaboutwayside.com.

I corrected the ref #5 issue. APK hi :-) (talk) 08:40, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Images are relevant, tagged with the proper licenses and credited to the authors. Y

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.